Category Archives: Organisational

Text of ICT Prosecutor’s Speech before South Asian Committee of EU Parliament

Full text of ICT prosecutor Advocate Zead-Al-Malum’s speech before EU Parliament’s Delegation on South Asia explaining the nature of the International Crimes Tribunal, its operations, and the safeguards that are built within the process to protect the human rights of the accused who are now on trial. Continue reading

Posted in Analysis, Diplomacy, ICT Update, Law, Lobbying, Rebuttals, Review, Submissions/Presentations/Speech | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Who’s Afraid of Sarmila Bose?

Sarmila Bose has been invited to key international policy talks on Pakistan over the last few years. This article looks at her connections to various think-tanks and policy groups in both UK and USA which possibly explains her research. Continue reading

Posted in 1971, Analysis, Controversy, Diplomacy, History, Lobbying, Policy, Politics, Revisionism | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Sarmila Bose, a dedicated advocate for a genocidal regime

She came like a whirlwind causing a little tsunami in the US capital. The day was March 15, 2011 and the place of occurrence was the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars. Continue reading

Posted in 1971, Analysis, Controversy, History, Jurisprudence, Law, Lobbying, Policy, Politics, Review, War Crimes, War Criminal | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off

Please Deselect International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) from the List of Honourees for 1971

According to media reports, the Government of Bangladesh, at its 40th anniversary of national independence, has taken the initiative to honour a number of individuals and organisations for their contributions during the Liberation War of 1971. While it is indeed a commendable move on the part of the government, attention of the concerned authorities also needs to be drawn urgently in respect of one particular organisation (ie, Geneva based International Commission of Jurists – ICJ) chosen for this unique honour. It is not clear what considerations prompted the government to select ICJ, but based on the review of one of ICJ’s widely quoted Report on 1971, the decision to honour ICJ appears to be an ill-advised and ill-judged one.

Briefly, ICSF’s review found the ICJ-report heavily biased and problematic on a number of aspects, such as legal, factual, strategic and diplomatic. For example, it concludes that the then leadership in 1971 were “not entitled in international law” to declare independence, effectively nullifying the legitimacy of Bangladesh’s birth. Moreover, the Report unfairly equated crimes committed by the Pakistani army and local collaborators against the people of Bangladesh with that of sufferings of the Biharis. Grossly distorting the facts, the Report categorically stated that both sides in the war committed similar “international crimes”. These are but a few of the problematic findings of this Report among many, and ICJ has never retracted its position publicly. It is our understanding that honouring ICJ would tantamount to endorsement of its findings on the part of the Government. Therefore, it is our humble request that the Government review its decision and deselect ICJ from the list of honourees. There may still be time to take rectifying measures, before the nation is left with an irrevocable bestowal of gratitude to an entity which did not deserve it in the first place… Continue reading

Posted in 1971, Analysis, Controversy, History, News, Organisational, Politics, Revisionism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Lord Avebury- A Policy of Appeasement?

A Policy of Appeasement? I was recently having a discussion with a friend about the International Crimes Tribunal in Bangladesh. He couldn’t understand why liberals and multiculturalists were being critical about the trial’s developments. This criticism is part of a … Continue reading

Posted in Controversy, Lobbying, News, Policy, Politics | 12 Comments

NOTICE!! “WCSF” Changes its Name to “ICSF”

Responding to the need for greater terminological clarity, WCSF (War Crimes Strategy Forum) has changed its name to ICSF (International Crimes Strategy Forum). The term “international crimes” encompasses all kinds of crimes that are currently within the jurisdiction of Bangladesh’s International Crimes (Tribunals) Act 1973, such as: war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity etc, which prompted this name-change.
From now onwards, the address of ICSF’s main portal page will be:
http://icsforum.org

All URL visits to any of ICSF’s older addresses to any of the sites (eg, E-Library, Media-Archive) will be automatically re-directed.
Thank you. Continue reading

Posted in Organisational | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Things Lord Avebury Failed to Mention and Clarify

A response to Lord Eric Avebury’s press statement issued in relation to Justice Concern (a Jamat front) backed House of Lords Seminar [..] Continue reading

Posted in 1971, Controversy, Discussion, Law, Lobbying, Politics, Rebuttals, Translation | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment