Follow ICSF on Facebook

Follow ICSF on Twitter
- Thanks, Selina. http://t.co/AS8p4UJK about 20 hours ago from Facebook ReplyRetweetFavorite
- A meeting by concerned Members of European Parliament (MEPs) constituting the “Delegation for relations with the... http://t.co/KqhNHbvT 10:11:17 AM February 07, 2012 from Facebook ReplyRetweetFavorite
- I uploaded a @YouTube video http://t.co/Jy28Ye48 EU Parliament Session about ICT process in Bangladesh 05:04:57 PM February 06, 2012 from Google ReplyRetweetFavorite
Recent Comments
-
Recent Posts
Categories
- 1971
- Analysis
- Archives
- Asylum
- Cartoon
- Constitutional Law
- Controversy
- Crimes Against Humanity
- Delwar Hossain Sayeedi
- Diplomacy
- Discussion
- E-Library 71
- History
- ICT Update
- Immigration
- Jurisprudence
- Law
- Lobbying
- Microblogging
- News
- Orders and Judgments
- Organisational
- Petitions and Applications
- Policy
- Politics
- Rebuttals
- Reference Material
- Review
- Revisionism
- Submissions/Presentations/Speech
- Translation
- Uncategorized
- War Crimes
- War Criminal
Category Archives: Organisational
Please Deselect International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) from the List of Honourees for 1971
According to media reports, the Government of Bangladesh, at its 40th anniversary of national independence, has taken the initiative to honour a number of individuals and organisations for their contributions during the Liberation War of 1971. While it is indeed a commendable move on the part of the government, attention of the concerned authorities also needs to be drawn urgently in respect of one particular organisation (ie, Geneva based International Commission of Jurists – ICJ) chosen for this unique honour. It is not clear what considerations prompted the government to select ICJ, but based on the review of one of ICJ’s widely quoted Report on 1971, the decision to honour ICJ appears to be an ill-advised and ill-judged one.
Briefly, ICSF’s review found the ICJ-report heavily biased and problematic on a number of aspects, such as legal, factual, strategic and diplomatic. For example, it concludes that the then leadership in 1971 were “not entitled in international law” to declare independence, effectively nullifying the legitimacy of Bangladesh’s birth. Moreover, the Report unfairly equated crimes committed by the Pakistani army and local collaborators against the people of Bangladesh with that of sufferings of the Biharis. Grossly distorting the facts, the Report categorically stated that both sides in the war committed similar “international crimes”. These are but a few of the problematic findings of this Report among many, and ICJ has never retracted its position publicly. It is our understanding that honouring ICJ would tantamount to endorsement of its findings on the part of the Government. Therefore, it is our humble request that the Government review its decision and deselect ICJ from the list of honourees. There may still be time to take rectifying measures, before the nation is left with an irrevocable bestowal of gratitude to an entity which did not deserve it in the first place… Continue reading
NOTICE!! “WCSF” Changes its Name to “ICSF”
Responding to the need for greater terminological clarity, WCSF (War Crimes Strategy Forum) has changed its name to ICSF (International Crimes Strategy Forum). The term “international crimes” encompasses all kinds of crimes that are currently within the jurisdiction of Bangladesh’s International Crimes (Tribunals) Act 1973, such as: war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity etc, which prompted this name-change.
From now onwards, the address of ICSF’s main portal page will be:
http://icsforum.org
All URL visits to any of ICSF’s older addresses to any of the sites (eg, E-Library, Media-Archive) will be automatically re-directed.
Thank you. Continue reading
Posted in Organisational
Tagged ICSF, International Crimes (Tribunals) Act 1973, WCSF
Leave a comment