Follow ICSF on Facebook

Follow ICSF on Twitter
- A meeting by concerned Members of European Parliament (MEPs) constituting the “Delegation for relations with the... http://t.co/KqhNHbvT about 18 hours ago from Facebook ReplyRetweetFavorite
- I uploaded a @YouTube video http://t.co/Jy28Ye48 EU Parliament Session about ICT process in Bangladesh 05:04:57 PM February 06, 2012 from Google ReplyRetweetFavorite
- Text of ICT Prosecutor’s Speech before South Asian Committee of EU Parliament | [icsf] BLOG http://t.co/EZaeKJ7n 07:21:37 PM February 04, 2012 from Facebook ReplyRetweetFavorite
Recent Comments
-
Recent Posts
Categories
- 1971
- Analysis
- Archives
- Asylum
- Cartoon
- Constitutional Law
- Controversy
- Crimes Against Humanity
- Delwar Hossain Sayeedi
- Diplomacy
- Discussion
- E-Library 71
- History
- ICT Update
- Immigration
- Jurisprudence
- Law
- Lobbying
- Microblogging
- News
- Orders and Judgments
- Organisational
- Petitions and Applications
- Policy
- Politics
- Rebuttals
- Reference Material
- Review
- Revisionism
- Submissions/Presentations/Speech
- Translation
- Uncategorized
- War Crimes
- War Criminal
Category Archives: Policy
Stephen Rapp: Of misconceptions, unrealistic expectations and double standards
As an act of civic engagement, this piece has sought to explore Mr. Rapp’s suggestions regarding the ICT and its governing statute. There is no argument against ensuring fairness and quality of the justice process initiated by the ICT. Attention, however, must also be given to the fundamental principles enshrined in the ICTA; any failure to maintain the right balance will allow impunity to continue and rule of law to be frustrated. Continue reading
Posted in Analysis, Controversy, Law, News, Policy, Rebuttals, Review
Tagged Ambassador, Dipu Moni, ICC, ICCPR, Rome Statute, Shafique Ahmed, Stephen Rapp
Leave a comment
Accepting “Death Penalty” under the 1973 Act
In a recently published interview, Lord Avebury seemed to have accepted death penalty as a form of punishment for the perpetrators of 1971 Liberation War, arguing that the same has popular acceptance and support in Bangladesh [..] Continue reading
Do we really need another indemnity law for the Freedom Fighters?
Is it possible that the “legal experts” advising the government are oblivious to the obvious existence of a law that already covers this area? Or is it to create and indemnify a new class of individuals based on considerations that have very little to do with law or justice? Continue reading
Posted in 1971, Controversy, Law, Policy, Politics
Leave a comment