Comments for [icsf] BLOG http://icsforum.org/blog International Crimes Strategy Forum's Group Blog Sun, 27 Nov 2011 04:45:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 Comment on Pieces of History by Rayhan Rashid http://icsforum.org/blog/rayhanrashid/icsf-e-book-1971-dispatches-us-electronic-media/#comment-903 Rayhan Rashid Sun, 27 Nov 2011 04:45:00 +0000 http://icsforum.org/blog/?p=221#comment-903 ধন্যবাদ, আলতাফ হোসেন। আশা করি ICSF এর এই ব্লগটি নিয়মিত পড়বেন। আমাদের চেষ্টা থাকবে বিচার প্রক্রিয়ার সাথে জড়িত কৌশলগত বিষয়গুলো নিয়মিত কাভার করার। ই-বুকটি সংশ্লিষ্ট কর্তৃপক্ষের কাছে পৌঁছে দেয়া হয়েছে। আমেরিকার ৩টি টিভি চ্যানেল থেকে প্রয়োজনীয় ফুটেজগুলো সংগ্রহের কাজও ICSF এর পক্ষ থেকে সমন্বয় করে এবং সেই সব দুর্লভ ফুটেজ সংশ্লিষ্ট কর্তৃপক্ষের কাছে পৌঁছে দেয়া হয়েছে। আমাদের গবেষণা টিমের স্বেচ্ছাসেবকরা সেই সব ফুটেজ বিশ্লেষণ করে তার ফলাফলও হস্তান্তর করেছে। এখন শুধু আশা করছি এই তথ্যগুলোর পূর্ণ সদ্ব্যবহার করতে সক্ষম হবেন সংশ্লিষ্ট ব্যক্তিবৃন্দ। ধন্যবাদ, আলতাফ হোসেন। আশা করি ICSF এর এই ব্লগটি নিয়মিত পড়বেন। আমাদের চেষ্টা থাকবে বিচার প্রক্রিয়ার সাথে জড়িত কৌশলগত বিষয়গুলো নিয়মিত কাভার করার।

ই-বুকটি সংশ্লিষ্ট কর্তৃপক্ষের কাছে পৌঁছে দেয়া হয়েছে। আমেরিকার ৩টি টিভি চ্যানেল থেকে প্রয়োজনীয় ফুটেজগুলো সংগ্রহের কাজও ICSF এর পক্ষ থেকে সমন্বয় করে এবং সেই সব দুর্লভ ফুটেজ সংশ্লিষ্ট কর্তৃপক্ষের কাছে পৌঁছে দেয়া হয়েছে। আমাদের গবেষণা টিমের স্বেচ্ছাসেবকরা সেই সব ফুটেজ বিশ্লেষণ করে তার ফলাফলও হস্তান্তর করেছে। এখন শুধু আশা করছি এই তথ্যগুলোর পূর্ণ সদ্ব্যবহার করতে সক্ষম হবেন সংশ্লিষ্ট ব্যক্তিবৃন্দ।

]]> Comment on Who’s Afraid of Sarmila Bose? by Oniket http://icsforum.org/blog/chrisblackburn/who%e2%80%99s-afraid-of-sarmila-bose/#comment-621 Oniket Mon, 30 May 2011 03:40:09 +0000 http://icsforum.org/blog/?p=578#comment-621 the design is a bit ক্ষ্যাত and it takes more time than as usual to browse this page. could you pay more to the operator of this page or hire someone more qualified? the design is a bit ক্ষ্যাত and it takes more time than as usual to browse this page. could you pay more to the operator of this page or hire someone more qualified?

]]> Comment on E-Library ’71 – recent additions – (May 2010, week 1) by Hobert Kropf http://icsforum.org/blog/admin/e-library-71-recent-additions-may-2010-week-1/#comment-588 Hobert Kropf Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:04:15 +0000 http://www.wcsf.info/blog/?p=54#comment-588 WONDERFUL Post.thanks share..more wait .. WONDERFUL Post.thanks share..more wait ..

]]> Comment on E-Library ‘71 – recent additions – (July 2010, week 2) by Elanor Vasques http://icsforum.org/blog/admin/e-library-71-recent-additions-july-2010-week-1-2/#comment-552 Elanor Vasques Thu, 07 Apr 2011 02:45:03 +0000 http://www.wcsf.info/blog/?p=172#comment-552 I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good. I do not know who you are but certainly you're going to a famous blogger if you are not already ;) Cheers! I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good. I do not know who you are but certainly you’re going to a famous blogger if you are not already ;) Cheers!

]]> Comment on Please Deselect International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) from the List of Honourees for 1971 by saikat http://icsforum.org/blog/rayhanrashid/honouringicj/#comment-493 saikat Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:08:44 +0000 http://icsforum.org/blog/?p=456#comment-493 We need to identify the person/group of persons who suggested the ICJ's name first, also curious to know how selection committe got convinced on this proposal and what exactly enticed them to go for such an extremely unwise selection. Would anyone, from the selection committe reading this write up/blog, please come up with a clarification on the matter? Saikat Acharjee We need to identify the person/group of persons who suggested the ICJ’s name first, also curious to know how selection committe got convinced on this proposal and what exactly enticed them to go for such an extremely unwise selection.

Would anyone, from the selection committe reading this write up/blog, please come up with a clarification on the matter?

Saikat Acharjee

]]> Comment on Please Deselect International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) from the List of Honourees for 1971 by Please Deselect International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) from the List of Honourees for 1971 http://icsforum.org/blog/rayhanrashid/honouringicj/#comment-487 Please Deselect International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) from the List of Honourees for 1971 Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:05:03 +0000 http://icsforum.org/blog/?p=456#comment-487 [...] post has been published simultaneously at ICSF-BLOG and [...] [...] post has been published simultaneously at ICSF-BLOG and [...]

]]> Comment on Accepting “Death Penalty” under the 1973 Act by Anonymous http://icsforum.org/blog/rayhanrashid/death-penalty-1973act/#comment-388 Anonymous Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:03:04 +0000 http://icsforum.org/blog/?p=411#comment-388 If one analyses the whole interview, would easily can see some kind of softness in his voice then before. Once a person previously has demand some changes of 73 act by refering the IBA advice, then it would not be very easy for him to leave that position at once. But this time, his argument was almost Zero as anyone can see thru the whole interview. He even did not strongly demand amendments of 73 act, but requested softly by saying "If possible". Whatever, his comments about the other points as he said about the issue of death penalty, Recognition of Genocide (himself & Internationally), supporting the Tribunal of BD, the improvement of human rights situation today in BD by comparing with BNP-Jamayat govt., by saying that Hill tracks peace process sabotized by BNP etc... would obviously work as a big barrier between him and Jamayat-BNP lobbyists in UK hopefully. By this time, even the Jamayat-BNP lobbyists in UK hopelessly would be very much surprise to see this kind of statements by Lord Avebury. I believe, which they were never thought before or been ready to hear!! He probably mentioned ICC for escaping from the previous mistakes. He as the same time, though indirectly, almost supported the death penalty which ICC does not recognize in their convention and said that it is the Bangladeshi people who would decide! Interesting? As the same way, it means that, it is the Bangladeshi people who would decide whether they will follow the ICC or not. Very diplomatic statement by Lord Avebury!!! God bless him!! If one analyses the whole interview, would easily can see some kind of softness in his voice then before. Once a person previously has demand some changes of 73 act by refering the IBA advice, then it would not be very easy for him to leave that position at once. But this time, his argument was almost Zero as anyone can see thru the whole interview. He even did not strongly demand amendments of 73 act, but requested softly by saying “If possible”.

Whatever, his comments about the other points as he said about the issue of death penalty, Recognition of Genocide (himself & Internationally), supporting the Tribunal of BD, the improvement of human rights situation today in BD by comparing with BNP-Jamayat govt., by saying that Hill tracks peace process sabotized by BNP etc… would obviously work as a big barrier between him and Jamayat-BNP lobbyists in UK hopefully.

By this time, even the Jamayat-BNP lobbyists in UK hopelessly would be very much surprise to see this kind of statements by Lord Avebury. I believe, which they were never thought before or been ready to hear!!

He probably mentioned ICC for escaping from the previous mistakes. He as the same time, though indirectly, almost supported the death penalty which ICC does not recognize in their convention and said that it is the Bangladeshi people who would decide! Interesting? As the same way, it means that, it is the Bangladeshi people who would decide whether they will follow the ICC or not. Very diplomatic statement by Lord Avebury!!! God bless him!!

]]> Comment on Accepting “Death Penalty” under the 1973 Act by ahmed ziauddin http://icsforum.org/blog/rayhanrashid/death-penalty-1973act/#comment-384 ahmed ziauddin Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:02:38 +0000 http://icsforum.org/blog/?p=411#comment-384 I don't think his position has at all changed. The EU, UK got entrenched view on death penalty, which, as a British politician he would not contradict. I see few possibilities; one, that his statements were misunderstood, as if his answers were not given in writing but on phone or face to face, he must have said a lot, before or after. The other one could be that he knew it is a Bangla daily and not likely to reach to wider world including in UK. The final possibility is, what I thought he said, that it is for the people of Bangladesh to decide, which indeed is the position of international law as there is no global consensus against death penalty, and ICC effectively has accepted this position. In addition to death penalty, what surprised me was his stress on ICC as a standard, which I don't think he referred to so much in previous discussions. His mantra so far was IBA, but here, he seems he has added ICC with it. I don’t think his position has at all changed. The EU, UK got entrenched view on death penalty, which, as a British politician he would not contradict. I see few possibilities; one, that his statements were misunderstood, as if his answers were not given in writing but on phone or face to face, he must have said a lot, before or after. The other one could be that he knew it is a Bangla daily and not likely to reach to wider world including in UK. The final possibility is, what I thought he said, that it is for the people of Bangladesh to decide, which indeed is the position of international law as there is no global consensus against death penalty, and ICC effectively has accepted this position.

In addition to death penalty, what surprised me was his stress on ICC as a standard, which I don’t think he referred to so much in previous discussions. His mantra so far was IBA, but here, he seems he has added ICC with it.

]]> Comment on Accepting “Death Penalty” under the 1973 Act by saikat http://icsforum.org/blog/rayhanrashid/death-penalty-1973act/#comment-383 saikat Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:50:26 +0000 http://icsforum.org/blog/?p=411#comment-383 I am really astound to see this part of the interview as referred to by the post author and that has left me completely flabbergasted. Had it been really true, then this stance of Mr Avebury seems to me to be a major policy shift. The reason, why I hold such a view, is that Mr Avebury's position happens to be exactly the opposite what he said in the interview and this is quite interesting. I think, his position change must be very significant (for us and for him too) which certainly would require a clarification, preferably from his Lordships Office. I am really astound to see this part of the interview as referred to by the post author and that has left me completely flabbergasted. Had it been really true, then this stance of Mr Avebury seems to me to be a major policy shift. The reason, why I hold such a view, is that Mr Avebury’s position happens to be exactly the opposite what he said in the interview and this is quite interesting. I think, his position change must be very significant (for us and for him too) which certainly would require a clarification, preferably from his Lordships Office.

]]> Comment on Abusing the War Crimes Trial by Nilanjana http://icsforum.org/blog/syeed/abusing-the-war-crimes-trial/#comment-340 Nilanjana Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:20:05 +0000 http://icsforum.org/blog/?p=376#comment-340 Is there any reason the alleged war criminals Golam Azam and SAKA Chowdhury have not been arrested yet? Is there any reason the alleged war criminals Golam Azam and SAKA Chowdhury have not been arrested yet?

]]>