<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.9.2" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>[icsf] BLOG</title>
	<link>http://icsforum.org/blog</link>
	<description>International Crimes Strategy Forum</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:38:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>E-Library ‘71 – recent additions – (July 2010, week 4)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Librarians’  Note: This E-Library is maintained by the War Crimes Strategy Forum (WCSF), a  strategic coalition of activists and organisations sharing   the common  goal of assisting the prosecution of war criminals of   Bangladesh 1971. Only  the members registered to E-Library site will  enjoy FULL-TEXT  download-access [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://icsforum.org/blog/admin/e-library-%e2%80%9871-recent-additions-july-2010-week-4/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Bangabandhu’s &#8216;General Amnesty&#8217; Declaration: Evidential Documents and Relevant Stories</title>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the widely used propaganda items by the alleged war criminal lobby is the claim that ‘it was Bangabandu who resolved the issue of war crime trials by declaring General Amnesty in favour of the perpetrators'. In light of existing existing documents including media reports, this post examines the claim and exposes the falsehood that such claims represent.]]></description>
		<link>http://icsforum.org/blog/admin/bangabandhu%e2%80%99s-general-amnesty-declaration-evidential-documents-and-relevant-stories/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>E-Library ‘71 – recent additions – (July 2010, week 3)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Librarians’  Note: This E-Library is maintained by the War Crimes Strategy Forum (WCSF), a  strategic coalition of activists and organisations sharing  the common  goal of assisting the prosecution of war criminals of  Bangladesh 1971. Only  the members registered to E-Library site will  enjoy FULL-TEXT  download-access to the [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://icsforum.org/blog/admin/e-library-71-recent-additions-july-2010-week-3/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>E-Library ‘71 – recent additions – (July 2010, week 2)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Librarians’  Note: This E-Library is maintained by the War Crimes Strategy Forum (WCSF), a  strategic coalition of activists and organisations sharing  the common  goal of assisting the prosecution of war criminals of  Bangladesh 1971. Only  the members registered to E-Library site will  enjoy FULL-TEXT  download-access to the [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://icsforum.org/blog/admin/e-library-71-recent-additions-july-2010-week-1-2/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>E-Library ‘71 – recent additions – (July 2010, week 1)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Librarians’  Note: This E-Library is maintained by the War Crimes Strategy Forum (WCSF), a  strategic coalition of activists and organisations sharing  the common  goal of assisting the prosecution of war criminals of  Bangladesh 1971. Only  the members registered to E-Library site will  enjoy FULL-TEXT  download-access to the [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://icsforum.org/blog/admin/e-library-71-recent-additions-july-2010-week-1/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Suspected move for political asylum in UK by Golam Azam: awaiting Visa after winning immigration appeal</title>
		<description><![CDATA[(Translated by Hillol Dutta from the news item originally published in Daily Kaler Kantha on 21 June.)

Golam Azam, the ex-Amir and one of the notorious alleged war criminals of Liberation War is trying to secretly flee from Bangladesh. All legal procedures have been adopted to avail a British visa for the ex-Amir. As soon as [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://icsforum.org/blog/admin/golam-azam-escape/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Things Lord Avebury Failed to Mention and Clarify</title>
		<description><![CDATA[It has now become a missed opportunity, and perhaps, made these discussions much more difficult to take place in future, since IBA too is now considered to have compromised its independence by attending this dubious seminar organised by a political lobby that represents the war criminals. We, who care about 1971 and the victims of war crimes, hold you personally responsible for harming the possibility of dialogue.]]></description>
		<link>http://icsforum.org/blog/admin/things-lord-avebury-failed-to-mention/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Controversial House of Lords Seminar Sponsored by War Criminal Lobbies</title>
		<description><![CDATA[An  attempt to make the ongoing trial of war criminals in Bangladesh  questionable in international arena has been wasted. One makeshift  organisation called 'Justice Concern' tried to arrange this with the  help of All-party Parliamentary Human Rights Group (APPGHR) of UK. The  role of Lord Avebury, the vice Chairman of APPGHR has also been  questioned by different quarters.]]></description>
		<link>http://icsforum.org/blog/admin/war-criminals-and-house-of-lords/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>E-Library ‘71 – recent additions – (June 2010, week 1)</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Librarians’  Note: This E-Library is maintained by the War Crimes Strategy Forum (WCSF), a  strategic coalition of activists and organisations sharing  the common  goal of assisting the prosecution of war criminals of  Bangladesh 1971. Only  the members registered to E-Library site will  enjoy FULL-TEXT  download-access to the [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://icsforum.org/blog/admin/e-library-%e2%80%9871-%e2%80%93-recent-additions-%e2%80%93-june-2010-week-1/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Do we really need another indemnity law for the Freedom Fighters?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it possible that the “legal experts” advising the government are oblivious to the obvious existence of a law that already covers this area? Or is it to create and indemnify a new class of individuals based on considerations that have very little to do with law or justice?]]></description>
		<link>http://icsforum.org/blog/rayhanrashid/do-we-really-need-another-indemnity-law-for-the-freedom-fighters/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
